Rapid CNC prototyping delivers precision-machined parts in 5 business days for components up to 200mm × 150mm × 100mm with ±0.05mm tolerances. Aluminum 6061-T6, stainless steel 304, and engineering plastics like PEEK achieve this timeline using 3-axis and 5-axis CNC machining, with single-piece minimum order quantity and as-machined surface finish included.
That’s the short answer. But whether your specific part qualifies depends on four factors: material selection, geometric complexity, tolerance requirements, and surface finishing needs.
Here’s what actually determines if you’ll hit that 5-day mark.
5-Day vs. Standard CNC: The Real Differences
Most manufacturers quote 10-15 days for CNC prototypes. You can cut that to 5 days, but not every part qualifies.
| Service Type | Lead Time | Standard Tolerance | Price Premium | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Rapid | 5 business days | ±0.05mm (ISO 2768-m) | +30-50% | Product validation, testing deadlines |
| Standard | 10-15 business days | ±0.05mm (ISO 2768-m) | Base price | Cost-conscious projects, flexible timelines |
| Economy | 15-20 business days | ±0.1mm (ISO 2768-c) | -20-30% | Non-critical prototypes, budget constraints |
| Ultra-Rapid | 3 business days | ±0.05mm (ISO 2768-m) | +80-100% | Emergency replacements, trade show demos |
The 30-50% premium isn’t arbitrary. Rush orders mean your parts jump the queue, machines run overtime, and engineers prioritize your CAM programming. We’ve run weekend shifts to deliver medical device prototypes that couldn’t miss FDA submission deadlines.
Your Part’s 5-Day Qualification Checklist
Not every design meets the 5-day window. Upload your CAD file, and here’s what determines feasibility:
Part Size Limits:
- Maximum dimensions: 200mm × 150mm × 100mm (7.87″ × 5.91″ × 3.94″)
- Parts exceeding this require larger machine setups, adding 2-3 days
- Minimum feature size: 0.5mm for metals, 1.0mm for plastics
Wall Thickness Requirements:
- Metals: 0.5mm minimum (0.8mm recommended for rigidity)
- Plastics: 1.0mm minimum (1.5mm recommended to prevent warping)
- Thinner walls risk tool deflection and require slower feed rates
Tolerance Specifications:
- ±0.05mm: Standard, achievable in 5 days
- ±0.02mm: Tight, achievable in 5 days with priority QC
- ±0.01mm: Very tight, may add 1 day for CMM verification
- Tighter than ±0.01mm: Requires 7-10 days with secondary grinding operations
Machining Axis Requirements:
- 3-axis geometry: Simple faces, pockets, holes → 5 days
- 3+2 positioning: Angled features on multiple sides → 5 days
- Full 5-axis continuous: Complex curves, undercuts → 5-6 days
- Features requiring >4 setups: 7-10 days minimum
Day-by-Day: What Actually Happens During Production

Let’s walk through a real project—an aluminum 6061-T6 electronics housing we delivered in 4.5 days for a Silicon Valley startup.
Day 0 (Upload to Quote): 2-12 hours
- 14:00: Client uploads STEP file
- 14:30: Automated DFM analysis flags thin wall (0.4mm)
- 15:00: Engineer reviews, suggests 0.6mm revision
- 16:00: Client approves modified design, places order
Day 1: Design Lock & Programming
- 08:00: CAD file locked, engineering review complete
- 10:00: CAM programmer generates toolpaths using Mastercam
- 14:00: G-code simulation run (collision detection, cycle time estimation)
- 15:30: Material requisition: 210mm × 160mm × 25mm aluminum 6061-T6 bar stock
- 16:00: Tooling prepared: 6mm end mill, 3mm ball nose, center drill, thread mill
Day 2: Setup & First Operations
- 08:30: Raw material mounted in 3-axis VMC (vertical machining center)
- 09:00: First operation: Face milling top surface (datum establishment)
- 09:30: Pocket roughing at 6000 RPM, 1200mm/min feed rate
- 11:00: Through-holes drilled (M3, M4 tapped holes)
- 13:00: In-process inspection: Critical dimensions verified with digital caliper
- 14:00: Part flipped, second side machining begins
- 16:30: Rough machining complete both sides
Day 3: Finishing & Deburring
- 08:00: Finish passes with 0.05mm depth of cut
- 10:00: Detail features: Engraved logos, ID markings
- 11:30: Thread milling for M5 × 0.8 mounting holes
- 13:00: Part removed, edges deburred manually
- 14:00: Ultrasonic cleaning to remove cutting fluid residue
- 15:00: CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) inspection begins
Day 4: Quality Verification
- 08:00: Dimensional report generated (18 critical dimensions checked)
- 09:30: Surface roughness measurement: Ra 1.2µm (specification was Ra 1.6µm max)
- 10:00: Client notified: “Parts pass QC, ready for as-machined delivery or finishing”
- 10:30: Client opts for bead blasting (adds 1 day)
- 11:00: Parts sent to finishing department
Day 5: Surface Finishing & Packaging
- 08:00: Glass bead blasting (80-grit media, uniform matte finish)
- 10:00: Final cleaning and inspection
- 11:00: Parts photographed for quality documentation
- 12:00: Packed with foam insert, dimensional report, material cert included
- 14:00: Shipped via DHL Express (2-day delivery to California)
Result: 4.5-day actual turnaround, delivered Saturday morning. Client ran functional tests Monday, found design flaw, ordered Revision B Tuesday—we delivered that in 5 days too.
This timeline holds for straightforward geometries. Complex 5-axis CNC prototyping with tight tolerances adds 1-2 days due to multi-angle setups and extended inspection protocols.
Materials That Meet the 5-Day Deadline

Machinability determines speed. Here’s the honest breakdown:
| Material | Machinability Rating | Typical Machining Time | 5-Day Capable? | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum 6061-T6 | 90/100 | 0.8-1.2 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes (fastest) | Housings, brackets, heat sinks |
| Aluminum 7075-T6 | 70/100 | 1.0-1.5 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Aerospace components, high-strength parts |
| Stainless Steel 304 | 45/100 | 2.5-3.5 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Food-grade equipment, medical devices |
| Stainless Steel 316 | 40/100 | 2.8-4.0 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Corrosion-resistant marine applications |
| Brass C360 | 85/100 | 1.0-1.5 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Electrical components, decorative parts |
| Copper 101 | 50/100 | 2.0-3.0 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Thermal management, electrodes |
| Titanium 6Al-4V | 25/100 | 5.0-7.0 hrs per setup | ✗ No (7-10 days) | Aerospace, implants (requires carbide tooling) |
| Tool Steel 4140 | 30/100 | 4.5-6.0 hrs per setup | ✗ No (7-10 days) | Fixtures, molds (pre-hardened or annealed only) |
| ABS Plastic | 95/100 | 0.5-0.8 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Functional prototypes, housings |
| Delrin (POM) | 95/100 | 0.5-0.9 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Gears, bearings, low-friction components |
| PEEK | 60/100 | 1.5-2.5 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | High-temp applications, medical implants |
| Nylon 6/6 | 80/100 | 0.8-1.3 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Wear-resistant parts, insulators |
| Polycarbonate | 85/100 | 0.7-1.2 hrs per setup | ✓ Yes | Transparent covers, impact-resistant parts |
Why Titanium Takes Longer: Titanium’s 25/100 machinability rating isn’t just a number. At 1668°C melting point and work-hardening characteristics, titanium requires:
- Carbide tooling with TiAlN coating (tool changes every 20-30 minutes)
- Slower feed rates (200-400mm/min vs. 1200mm/min for aluminum)
- Flood coolant to manage heat (chips can ignite if dry-machined)
- More frequent in-process measurements due to material spring-back
We still machine titanium—just not in 5 days. Budget 7-10 days for Ti-6Al-4V prototypes.
Plastic Prototype Speed Advantage: Engineering plastics machine 40-60% faster than metals. A Delrin part with identical geometry to an aluminum version completes in 3-4 days, not 5. But plastics have limitations: no structural loads above 70°C, dimensional stability issues with thin walls below 1.5mm.
Need help choosing? Our engineers compare CNC machining vs. 3D printing for prototypes based on material properties, not just lead time.
Surface Finishes: How They Impact Your Timeline
As-machined finish keeps you in the 5-day window. Anything else adds days.
| Finish Type | Additional Days | Total Turnaround | Surface Ra Value | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As-Machined | +0 days | 5 days | 0.8-3.2µm | Functional testing, internal components |
| Bead Blasting | +1 day | 6 days | 1.6-3.2µm | Uniform matte appearance, pre-paint prep |
| Anodizing Type II | +2 days | 7 days | No change | Corrosion protection, colored aluminum |
| Anodizing Type III | +3 days | 8 days | No change | Hard coat, wear resistance (50+ HRC) |
| Powder Coating | +3 days | 8 days | 25-100µm | Durable colored finish, outdoor applications |
| Electropolishing | +2-3 days | 7-8 days | 0.2-0.8µm | Ultra-smooth finish, pharmaceutical equipment |
| Chrome Plating | +4 days | 9 days | 0.1-0.4µm | Decorative, corrosion resistance |
| Passivation | +1 day | 6 days | No change | Stainless steel corrosion resistance |
Real Project Example: A medical device manufacturer needed a stainless steel 316L component with electropolished finish (required for FDA Class II compliance). Timeline breakdown:
- CNC machining: 3.5 days
- Deburring and pre-polish: 0.5 days
- Electropolishing (outsourced): 2 days
- Final inspection and documentation: 1 day
- Total: 7 days
They initially requested 5-day delivery. We explained the electropolishing bottleneck on Day 1. They accepted 7 days, received parts on schedule, and have been reordering monthly for 18 months.
Yanmee’s CMF (Color, Material, Finish) mastery means we coordinate finishing in-house or with certified partners, not third-party vendors who ghost you for status updates.
Tolerances: What’s Achievable in 5 Days
ISO 2768-m (medium) is the standard. Tighter specs add inspection time.
Standard Tolerance (±0.05mm): 5 Days
- Covers 90% of functional prototype requirements
- Hole-to-hole positional accuracy: ±0.08mm
- Flatness/parallelism: 0.05mm per 100mm
- Perpendicularity: 0.1mm per 100mm
- Thread tolerances: 6H/6g class fit
Tight Tolerance (±0.02mm): 5-6 Days
- Requires additional CMM inspection (adds 0.5-1 day)
- Critical for mating parts with close fits (H7/g6, H7/h6)
- Feature-to-feature dimensions: ±0.02mm
- Perpendicularity: 0.03mm per 100mm
Very Tight Tolerance (±0.01mm): 6-7 Days
- Watch-maker grade precision (Yanmee’s specialty)
- Full CMM inspection report with 100% of features measured
- May require secondary grinding operations for flatness
- Temperature-controlled environment during measurement (20°C ±1°C)
- Typical for precision assemblies, gauge blocks, tooling masters
Hole Tolerances Explained:
- H7 tolerance (common): Ø10mm +0.015/0 (10.000-10.015mm actual)
- H6 tolerance (tight): Ø10mm +0.009/0 (10.000-10.009mm actual)
- Unspecified holes: Typically held to ±0.05mm (10mm ±0.05mm = 9.95-10.05mm)
Thread Tolerances:
- Class 6H (internal threads): Standard fit, easy assembly
- Class 6g (external threads): Standard fit, easy assembly
- Class 4H/4h (closer fit): Minimal play, more precise assembly
- Yanmee can hold 6H/6g in 5 days, 4H/4h requires 6-7 days due to thread milling precision requirements
We’ve delivered ±0.01mm tolerance parts in 5 days when clients expedite CMM inspection to overnight priority (adds $50-80 per part). Most don’t need it.
Geometric Complexity: When 5 Days Becomes 7
Simple prismatic shapes? Easy. Organic curves and undercuts? Harder.
3-Axis Friendly (5 Days):
- Flat surfaces on 2-4 faces
- Through-holes perpendicular to faces
- Pockets with straight walls
- Engraved text or 2D logos
- Chamfers and fillets with standard radii (R0.5mm+)
3+2 Positioning (5-6 Days):
- Angled holes (e.g., 45° mounting holes)
- Features on 5-6 faces requiring rotation
- Compound angles < 45° from primary axes
- Non-perpendicular chamfers
Full 5-Axis Continuous (6-7 Days):
- Sculptured surfaces (turbine blades, impellers)
- Deep pockets with undercuts
- Complex organic shapes
- Features requiring simultaneous 5-axis movement
- Tight-radius fillets in deep cavities (R < 1mm)
Example: Consumer Electronics Housing
- Material: Aluminum 6061-T6
- Size: 120mm × 80mm × 15mm
- Features: 4 faces machined, 12 through-holes, recessed logo, rounded corners R3mm
- Machining: 3-axis VMC, 2 setups (top/bottom)
- Timeline: 4 days actual (1 day ahead of 5-day promise)
Example: Automotive Bracket with Undercuts
- Material: Aluminum 7075-T6
- Size: 95mm × 60mm × 25mm
- Features: Angled mounting holes (30° and 60°), internal undercut for cable routing, lightening pockets
- Machining: 5-axis continuous, single setup
- Timeline: 6 days (undercut required ball-nose toolpath with multiple approach angles)
Complex doesn’t always mean expensive. Sometimes 5-axis machining in a single setup costs less than 3-axis requiring four setups with custom fixtures.
Industries Relying on 5-Day Rapid Prototyping
Medical Device Development:
- FDA submission deadlines don’t move—your parts must arrive on time
- Material: Stainless steel 316L, PEEK (biocompatible)
- Typical part: Surgical instrument housings, implant testing prototypes
- Yanmee advantage: ISO 13485 process capability (clean room machining available)
Consumer Electronics:
- Trade show demos, investor presentations, pre-production testing
- Material: Aluminum 6061 (anodized), magnesium alloys (lightweight)
- Typical part: Smartphone housings, laptop chassis, wearable device enclosures
- Yanmee clients: Fortune 500 brands like Xiaomi, Haier (see testimonials on our about page)
Automotive:
- Engine component validation, fixture testing, low-volume racing parts
- Material: Aluminum 7075 (high strength-to-weight), tool steel 4140 (wear resistance)
- Typical part: Intake manifold prototypes, custom brackets, sensor housings
Home Appliances:
- Pre-production appearance models, functional testing units
- Material: ABS (cost-effective), polycarbonate (transparent windows), stainless steel (food contact)
- Typical part: Control panel housings, motor mounts, structural frames
- Yanmee experience: 12+ years serving Midea, Panasonic, Toshiba
3C Products (Computer, Communication, Consumer Electronics):
- Rapid iteration cycles (2-3 design versions per week)
- Material: Aluminum, magnesium, engineering plastics
- Typical part: Laptop hinges, tablet frames, router enclosures
We’ve machined parts for all these industries. The commonality? Deadline pressure and zero tolerance for late delivery.
Cost Reality: What You’ll Actually Pay
No one publishes exact pricing (too many variables), but here are honest ranges based on 500+ quotes we’ve processed in 2024-2025:
Simple Aluminum Part (50mm × 50mm × 10mm, 3-axis):
- Standard 10-day service: $45-75
- 5-day rapid service: $60-100 (+30-35% premium)
- 3-day ultra-rapid: $90-140 (+100% premium)
Medium Complexity Part (120mm × 80mm × 25mm, 3+2 positioning):
- Standard 10-day service: $180-280
- 5-day rapid service: $240-380 (+35-40% premium)
Complex Part (150mm × 100mm × 50mm, full 5-axis):
- Standard 10-day service: $450-750
- 5-day rapid service: $600-1050 (+35-45% premium)
Material Cost Multipliers (vs. Aluminum Baseline):
- Stainless steel 304/316: 1.5-1.8x
- Brass: 1.3-1.5x
- Titanium: 3.0-4.5x
- ABS/Delrin: 0.8-1.0x (cheaper than aluminum)
- PEEK: 2.5-3.5x (material cost + difficult machining)
Surface Finish Costs (Added to Base Machining):
- Bead blasting: $15-30 per part
- Anodizing Type II (clear or colored): $25-45 per part
- Anodizing Type III (hard coat): $40-70 per part
- Powder coating: $35-60 per part
- Electropolishing: $50-90 per part
Volume Pricing:
- 1 piece: Base price
- 5 pieces: 10-15% discount per piece
- 10 pieces: 15-25% discount per piece
- 50 pieces: 25-35% discount per piece (often better to switch to soft tooling for small-batch production at this quantity)
Hidden Costs to Avoid:
- Multiple revisions: Lock your design before ordering
- Unclear specifications: Provide 2D drawings with critical dimensions noted
- Rush finishing: If you need anodizing in 5 days total, tell us upfront—we’ll quote premium finishing
- Incomplete CAD files: Missing faces, intersecting surfaces, corrupt geometry add delays and engineering fees ($50-150 to repair)
Money-Saving Strategies:
- Standard tolerances: ±0.05mm costs less than ±0.02mm (no extra inspection)
- As-machined finish: Skip bead blasting if appearance isn’t critical
- Common materials: Aluminum 6061 costs 40% less than 7075 (often no performance difference)
- Simplified geometry: Eliminate features that don’t affect function (decorative chamfers, unnecessary pockets)
- Design for 3-axis: Avoid 5-axis complexity unless geometry truly requires it
One client saved $180 per part by changing from titanium to 7075-T6 aluminum—the part performed identically in their testing rig. We suggested it during DFM review; they appreciated the honesty.
5-Day Prototyping vs. Other Fast Methods
You have options. Here’s when CNC makes sense versus alternatives:
CNC vs. 3D Printing:
When CNC Wins:
- You need production-grade materials (aluminum, stainless steel)
- Tolerances tighter than ±0.1mm required
- Surface finish matters (Ra < 3.2µm)
- Parts will undergo load testing (tensile strength, fatigue)
- Budget allows for $100-500+ per part
When 3D Printing Wins:
- Geometry has internal channels or lattice structures (impossible to machine)
- You need 5-10 design iterations in 2 weeks
- Budget is $20-80 per part
- Tolerances of ±0.2mm are acceptable
- Material properties matter less than form validation
Read our full CNC machining vs. 3D printing comparison for material-by-material analysis.
CNC vs. Vacuum Casting:
When CNC Wins:
- You need 1-5 pieces (vacuum casting requires silicone mold creation)
- Tolerances tighter than ±0.15mm
- Metal properties required
- Design changes likely between iterations
When Vacuum Casting Wins:
- You need 10-50 identical pieces
- Soft-touch overmolding or multi-color parts
- Elastomeric materials (shore A 30-90)
- Budget is $8-25 per piece after mold amortization
We guide clients through vacuum casting vs. injection molding for small batches based on quantities and design complexity.
CNC vs. Sheet Metal Fabrication:
When CNC Wins:
- Part thickness varies (thick bosses, thin walls)
- Complex 3D geometry (pockets, curved surfaces)
- Tolerances tighter than ±0.5mm
- Small quantities (1-20 pieces)
When Sheet Metal Wins:
- Simple bent/formed shapes (brackets, enclosures)
- Large flat areas (chassis, panels > 300mm)
- Uniform material thickness
- Cost is primary concern (<$50 per part)
Real Case Study: Medical Device Prototype Rush
Client: California-based medical device startup
Challenge: FDA submission deadline in 6 days, needed functional prototype for investor demo
Part: Surgical instrument housing, stainless steel 316L
Timeline Received: 2 days before their deadline (they tried another supplier first, got ghosted)
Our Response:
- Hour 1: Engineering review identified tolerance conflict (thread callout impossible with specified wall thickness)
- Hour 2: Video call with their engineer, suggested design modification
- Hour 3: Revised CAD approved, material ordered (we had 316L in stock)
- Day 1: CAM programming complete, first setup machining underway
- Day 2: Both sides machined, thread milling complete
- Day 3: CMM inspection, dimensional report generated, passivation treatment
- Day 4: Overnight shipping to California
Result: Delivered 4 days total, 2 days ahead of their FDA submission. They placed a $78,000 order for 200 pieces three months later after approval.
Lesson: Most “rushed” projects have time if you communicate honestly. We could’ve said “5 days minimum” and lost the job. Instead: “We can do 4 days if you approve the design change within 2 hours.” They did.
Optimizing Your Design for 5-Day Delivery
DFM Checklist for Fast Turnaround:
- Use Standard Tool Sizes
- Holes: Ø3mm, Ø4mm, Ø5mm, Ø6mm, Ø8mm, Ø10mm (common drill sizes)
- Avoid: Ø3.7mm, Ø6.3mm (requires special tooling)
- Milling pocket width: Multiples of 3mm, 6mm, 10mm (standard end mill sizes)
- Adequate Corner Radii
- Internal corners: R0.5mm minimum (R1.0mm preferred)
- Sharp internal corners are impossible (tool is round)
- External corners: Can be sharp (0mm radius), but R0.2mm prevents burrs
- Reasonable Wall Thickness
- Metals: 0.8mm minimum (1.5mm eliminates deflection risk)
- Plastics: 1.5mm minimum (2.0mm prevents warping)
- Deep pockets: Width ≥ 3× depth (prevents tool chatter)
- Accessible Features
- Holes deeper than 5× diameter require special drills
- Pockets deeper than 3× width require long-reach tooling
- Internal threads: Depth < 1.5× diameter (avoid tap breakage)
- Tolerances Where They Matter
- Specify ±0.02mm only on critical mating surfaces
- Use ±0.05mm for non-critical dimensions (saves inspection time)
- Hole position tolerances: ±0.05mm is standard, ±0.02mm adds inspection
- Standard Threads
- Metric: M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M8, M10 (fast to thread mill)
- Imperial: #4-40, #6-32, #8-32, 1/4-20, 5/16-18 (common taps)
- Avoid: M3.5, M7, #7-32 (non-standard sizes require special tooling)
CAD File Requirements:
- Formats: STEP (.stp) or IGES (.igs) preferred (native geometry, no translation errors)
- Acceptable: Solidworks (.sldprt), Inventor (.ipt), Parasolid (.x_t)
- Avoid: STL (faceted approximation, loses precision), DXF (2D only)
- Include: 2D drawings with critical dimensions, tolerance callouts, surface finish notes
Free DFM Service: Upload your CAD file to our platform. Within 12 hours, you’ll receive:
- Manufacturability analysis (red-flag issues)
- Timeline estimate (5 days, 7 days, or 10+ days)
- Suggested design optimizations
- Material recommendations
- Quote with itemized costs
Engineers review every file manually—no algorithmic guesswork.
Why Yanmee Delivers 5-Day Prototypes Consistently
12 Years of Precision Manufacturing: Since 2013, we’ve completed 10,000+ prototype projects across medical devices, consumer electronics, automotive components, and industrial equipment. Fortune 500 companies like Haier, Midea, Xiaomi, and Panasonic trust us with their tightest deadlines.
Watch-Maker Grade ±0.01mm Capability: Our 5-axis CNC machining centers (DMG Mori, Haas) maintain ±0.005mm repeatability. We calibrate machines daily using laser interferometry per ISO 230-2 standards. CMM inspection room controlled to 20°C ±1°C per ISO 10360-2.
40% Faster Time-to-Market: Integrated workflow: prototype → design validation → low-volume production → tooling → mass production—all under one roof. No handoffs between vendors. Emily Roberts (US client) stated: “Yanmee delivered prototypes in 5 days, allowing immediate user testing and iteration.”
Single-Piece MOQ: Order one part or 50—same 5-day commitment. Unlike injection molding (500+ MOQ) or die casting (1000+ MOQ), CNC has no minimum. You pay for machine time, not amortized tooling.
Full CMF Integration: Our Color, Material, Finish expertise coordinates machining + finishing in one timeline. Anodizing partner is 10 minutes away (not outsourced across provinces). Powder coating done in-house. Result: predictable schedules, no vendor finger-pointing.
ISO 9001:2015 Certified: Quality management system ensures: documented procedures, in-process inspection, corrective action tracking, and customer feedback loops. Every part ships with dimensional report and material certification.
Global Reach: Serving 20+ countries with English-speaking engineers. DHL Express shipping: 2-3 days to North America, 3-4 days to Europe. We’ve shipped prototypes to California on Friday that clients tested Monday morning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, for parts up to 200mm × 150mm with ±0.05mm tolerances using aluminum or common engineering plastics. Complex 5-axis geometries or tight tolerances (±0.01mm) may require 6 days with additional CMM inspection. Titanium and tool steel typically need 7-10 days. Upload your CAD file for a precise timeline estimate based on your specific design.
Single-piece MOQ—order just one prototype without setup fees. CNC machining has no tooling requirements, unlike injection molding (500+ unit MOQ) or die casting (1000+ unit MOQ). Whether you need 1 prototype or 50 pieces, the 5-day timeline applies. Volume discounts begin at 5 pieces with 10-15% per-part savings.
Aluminum alloys (6061-T6, 7075-T6), stainless steel (304, 316), brass, copper, and engineering plastics (ABS, Delrin, PEEK, nylon, polycarbonate) all qualify for 5-day delivery. Titanium requires 7-10 days due to difficult machinability and carbide tooling requirements. Tool steel 4140 needs similar timelines unless pre-hardened. Material certificates (ASTM, ISO) included.
Yes. As-machined finish meets the 5-day window. Bead blasting adds 1 day (6 days total). Anodizing Type II adds 2 days (7 days total). Powder coating adds 3 days (8 days total). Electropolishing requires 2-3 additional days. Your quote clearly shows total lead time when selecting finishing options during ordering.
5-day rapid service costs 30-50% more than standard 10-15 day lead times due to priority scheduling and expedited processing. Simple aluminum parts: $60-100 (vs. $45-75 standard). Complex parts: $600-1050 (vs. $450-750 standard). Volume discounts of 15-35% apply for 10+ pieces. Exact pricing depends on material, size, complexity, tolerances, and surface finishing requirements.